prawn: has sweetness sweet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bait
Weight: 0.62
, ingredient
Weight: 0.54
, crustacean
Weight: 0.51
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.50
, fish
Weight: 0.47
Siblings shrimp
Weight: 0.36
, mackerel
Weight: 0.36
, squid
Weight: 0.35
, crayfish
Weight: 0.34
, lobster
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has sweetness sweet 1.00
taste sweet 0.91
is crunchy 0.78
is chewy 0.77
taste good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(crustacean, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(prawn, has sweetness sweet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(crustacean, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(crustacean, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(crustacean, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(prawn, has sweetness sweet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(prawn, has sweetness sweet)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(prawn, taste sweet)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(prawn, taste sweet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(prawn, is crunchy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(prawn, is crunchy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(prawn, is chewy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(prawn, taste sweet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(prawn, taste sweet)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(prawn, is crunchy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(prawn, is chewy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(prawn, is chewy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(prawn, is crunchy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(prawn, is chewy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(prawn, taste good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(prawn, taste good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(prawn, taste good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(prawn, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(prawn, has sweetness sweet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(prawn, has sweetness sweet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(crustacean, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(prawn, has sweetness sweet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(crustacean, taste good)