predator: be in desert

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.73
, spider
Weight: 0.73
, beetle
Weight: 0.72
, owl
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in desert 1.00
be absent from desert ecosystems 0.81
be more common than than deserts 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(predator, be in desert)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(predator, be absent from desert ecosystems)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(predator, be absent from desert ecosystems)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(predator, be absent from desert ecosystems)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(predator, be absent from desert ecosystems)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(predator, be more common than than deserts)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(predator, be more common than than deserts)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(predator, be more common than than deserts)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(predator, be more common than than deserts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(predator, be in desert)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(predator, be in desert)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(predator, be in desert)