predator: be rated 18

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.73
, spider
Weight: 0.73
, beetle
Weight: 0.72
, owl
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rated 18 1.00
be rated r 2018 0.92
is 1987 rated r 0.91
is 2 rated r 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(predator, be rated 18)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(predator, be rated r 2018)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(predator, is 1987 rated r)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(predator, is 2 rated r)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(predator, be rated r 2018)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(predator, is 1987 rated r)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(predator, be rated r 2018)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(predator, is 2 rated r)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(predator, is 2 rated r)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(predator, is 1987 rated r)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(predator, is 1987 rated r)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(predator, be rated r 2018)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(predator, is 2 rated r)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(predator, be rated 18)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(predator, be rated 18) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(predator, be rated 18)