predator: has eye look forward

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, film
Weight: 0.57
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.73
, spider
Weight: 0.73
, beetle
Weight: 0.72
, owl
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
has eye look forward 1.00
has eye 0.85
look close than they be 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(thing, look close than they be)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(predator, has eye look forward)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(thing, look close than they be)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(thing, look close than they be)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(owl, has eye)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(thing, look close than they be)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(predator, has eye look forward)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(owl, has eye)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(owl, has eye)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(predator, has eye look forward)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(predator, has eye look forward)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(predator, has eye look forward)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(thing, look close than they be)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(owl, has eye)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(predator, has eye look forward)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(thing, look close than they be)