predator: has physical part eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.73
, spider
Weight: 0.73
, beetle
Weight: 0.72
, owl
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part eyes 1.00
have yellow eyes 0.82
have eyes in different positions 0.79
have forward facing eyes 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part eyes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(owl, have yellow eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(spider, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(spider, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(spider, has physical part eyes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(owl, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part eyes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(owl, have yellow eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(owl, have yellow eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(predator, has physical part eyes)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(predator, have eyes in different positions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(predator, have eyes in different positions)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(predator, have forward facing eyes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(predator, have eyes in different positions)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(predator, have eyes in different positions)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(predator, have forward facing eyes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(predator, have forward facing eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(predator, have forward facing eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(predator, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part eyes)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(spider, has physical part eyes)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(owl, have yellow eyes)