predator: is good pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, insect
Weight: 0.59
, movie
Weight: 0.58
, hazard
Weight: 0.58
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.75
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.73
, spider
Weight: 0.73
, beetle
Weight: 0.72
, owl
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good pets 1.00
make good pets 0.98
eat rabbits 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(predator, is good pets)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(predator, make good pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(predator, make good pets)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(predator, make good pets)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(predator, make good pets)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(predator, eat rabbits)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(predator, eat rabbits)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(predator, eat rabbits)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(predator, eat rabbits)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(predator, is good pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(predator, is good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(predator, is good pets)