premiere: has quality benefits

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.62
, event
Weight: 0.61
, publication
Weight: 0.59
, magazine
Weight: 0.56
, program
Weight: 0.52
Siblings movie
Weight: 0.34
, film maker
Weight: 0.34
, gala
Weight: 0.34
, movie star
Weight: 0.34
, television show
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality benefits 1.00
has quality good 0.77
has quality worth 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(magazine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(premiere, has quality benefits)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(premiere, has quality benefits)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(film, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(magazine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magazine, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(film, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(gala, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(magazine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(premiere, has quality benefits)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(premiere, has quality benefits)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(gala, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(gala, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(movie, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(movie, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(premiere, has quality benefits)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(premiere, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(premiere, has quality worth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(premiere, has quality worth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(premiere, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(premiere, has quality worth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(premiere, has quality worth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(premiere, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(premiere, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(premiere, has quality benefits)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(magazine, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(gala, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(premiere, has quality benefits)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(magazine, has quality good)