presence: affect rate of decomposition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.61
, element
Weight: 0.60
, characteristic
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.59
Siblings influence
Weight: 0.33
, strength
Weight: 0.33
, concentration
Weight: 0.33
, contribution
Weight: 0.32
, footprint
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect rate of decomposition 1.00
affect rate 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(presence, affect rate of decomposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(concentration, affect rate)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(presence, affect rate of decomposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(concentration, affect rate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(concentration, affect rate)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(presence, affect rate of decomposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(presence, affect rate of decomposition)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(presence, affect rate of decomposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(presence, affect rate)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(presence, affect rate of decomposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(presence, affect rate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(presence, affect rate of decomposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(presence, affect rate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(presence, affect rate of decomposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(presence, affect rate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(presence, affect rate of decomposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(presence, affect rate of decomposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(presence, affect rate of decomposition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(presence, affect rate of decomposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(presence, affect rate of decomposition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(presence, affect rate of decomposition) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(concentration, affect rate)