preserve: be at can

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, product
Weight: 0.53
, place
Weight: 0.51
, national park
Weight: 0.47
, land
Weight: 0.46
Siblings keep
Weight: 0.32
, harmony
Weight: 0.31
, remember
Weight: 0.31
, make
Weight: 0.31
, national monument
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at can 1.00
be motivated by you need that information 0.81
be motivated by be able to do it again 0.81
be motivated by you need to remember 0.78
be at we do not understand 0.78
requires try 0.77
do not work well 0.76
be happen without your know 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(preserve, be at can)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(thing, be happen without your know)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(preserve, be at can)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(preserve, be at can)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(thing, be happen without your know)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(thing, be happen without your know)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(remember, be motivated by you need that information)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(remember, requires try)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(remember, be motivated by be able to do it again)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(remember, be motivated by you need to remember)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(preserve, be at can)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(thing, be happen without your know)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(preserve, be at can)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(preserve, be at can)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(remember, be motivated by be able to do it again)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(remember, be motivated by be able to do it again)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(remember, be motivated by you need that information)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(remember, be motivated by you need that information)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(remember, be motivated by you need to remember)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(remember, be motivated by you need to remember)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(remember, requires try)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(remember, requires try)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(preserve, be at can)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(preserve, be at can)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(thing, be happen without your know)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(remember, be motivated by you need that information)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(remember, be motivated by be able to do it again)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(remember, be motivated by you need to remember)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(remember, requires try)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(thing, be happen without your know)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(preserve, be at can)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)