pride: affect decisions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.65
, virtue
Weight: 0.64
, feeling
Weight: 0.64
, value
Weight: 0.63
, attitude
Weight: 0.62
Siblings joy
Weight: 0.35
, patriotism
Weight: 0.35
, passion
Weight: 0.34
, sadness
Weight: 0.34
, confidence
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect decisions 1.00
making decisions 0.92
making decisions about technology 0.87
affect trust in recommendations 0.79
be important in consumer decision making 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(value, making decisions about technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pride, affect decisions)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(attitude, be important in consumer decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pride, affect decisions)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(value, making decisions about technology)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(attitude, be important in consumer decision making)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(value, making decisions about technology)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(attitude, be important in consumer decision making)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(confidence, affect trust in recommendations)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(value, making decisions about technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pride, affect decisions)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(attitude, be important in consumer decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(pride, affect decisions)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(confidence, affect trust in recommendations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(confidence, affect trust in recommendations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(pride, affect decisions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pride, affect decisions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(pride, affect decisions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(value, making decisions about technology)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(attitude, be important in consumer decision making)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(confidence, affect trust in recommendations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(value, making decisions about technology)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(pride, affect decisions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(attitude, be important in consumer decision making)