primate: be much stronger than humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, creature
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bonobo
Weight: 0.72
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.70
, baboon
Weight: 0.67
, great ape
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
be much stronger than humans 1.00
be stronger than humans 0.99
be stronger than humans pound 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be stronger than humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(monkey, be stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(monkey, be stronger than humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(primate, be much stronger than humans)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(primate, be stronger than humans)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(primate, be stronger than humans pound)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(primate, be stronger than humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(primate, be stronger than humans pound)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(primate, be stronger than humans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(primate, be stronger than humans)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(primate, be stronger than humans pound)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(primate, be stronger than humans pound)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(primate, be much stronger than humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(primate, be much stronger than humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(primate, be much stronger than humans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(monkey, be stronger than humans)