primate: form groups

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.69
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, creature
Weight: 0.54
, man
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bonobo
Weight: 0.72
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.70
, baboon
Weight: 0.67
, great ape
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
form groups 1.00
live in groups 0.86
live in social groups 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, live in groups)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(baboon, live in groups)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(spider monkey, live in groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, live in groups)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(baboon, live in groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(baboon, live in groups)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(primate, form groups)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(primate, live in groups)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(primate, live in social groups)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(primate, live in groups)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(primate, live in groups)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(primate, live in groups)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(primate, form groups)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(primate, form groups)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(baboon, live in groups)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(primate, form groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(spider monkey, live in groups)