princess: is mononoke good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.64
, character
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.60
Siblings queen elizabeth
Weight: 0.66
, cinderella
Weight: 0.66
, ariel
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
is mononoke good 1.00
has quality good 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(ariel, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(cinderella, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(cinderella, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cinderella, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(ariel, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(ariel, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(princess, is mononoke good)

Similarity expansion

0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(princess, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(princess, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(princess, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(princess, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(princess, is mononoke good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(princess, is mononoke good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ariel, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(princess, is mononoke good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cinderella, has quality good)