principle: be used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guideline
Weight: 0.67
, concept
Weight: 0.66
, idea
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.75
, faith
Weight: 0.70
, honesty
Weight: 0.69
, liberty
Weight: 0.69
, transparency
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used 1.00
be used for purposes 0.81
be used purchase 0.78
be used for evil purposes 0.77
utilized by fast-food restaurants 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(principle, be used)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(faith, be used for evil purposes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(principle, be used)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(faith, be used for evil purposes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(faith, be used for evil purposes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(principle, be used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(principle, be used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(principle, be used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(faith, be used for evil purposes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(principle, be used)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(concept, utilized by fast-food restaurants)