principle: differs in federal court

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents guideline
Weight: 0.67
, concept
Weight: 0.66
, idea
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fairness
Weight: 0.75
, faith
Weight: 0.70
, honesty
Weight: 0.69
, liberty
Weight: 0.69
, transparency
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
differs in federal court 1.00
differs in court 0.95
differ in bjt 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(concept, differ in bjt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(principle, differs in federal court)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(concept, differ in bjt)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(concept, differ in bjt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(concept, differ in bjt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(principle, differs in federal court)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(principle, differs in federal court)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(principle, differs in court)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(principle, differs in court)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(principle, differs in court)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(principle, differs in court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(principle, differs in federal court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(principle, differs in federal court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(concept, differ in bjt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(principle, differs in federal court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(concept, differ in bjt)