prism: break up white light

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.60
, system
Weight: 0.60
, lens
Weight: 0.58
, shape
Weight: 0.57
Siblings contact lens
Weight: 0.35
, camera lens
Weight: 0.34
, mirror
Weight: 0.34
, matrix
Weight: 0.32
, magnifying glass
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
break up white light 1.00
break up light 0.96
separate colors in white light 0.83
separate colors in light 0.79
affect light 0.78
split light 0.78
disperse white light 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lens, affect light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(prism, break up white light)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lens, affect light)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(lens, affect light)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(lens, affect light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(prism, break up white light)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(prism, break up white light)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(prism, break up light)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(prism, break up light)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(prism, break up light)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(prism, break up light)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(prism, affect light)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(prism, break up white light)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(prism, break up white light)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lens, affect light)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(prism, break up white light) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(lens, affect light)