prison: have tv

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.60
, structure
Weight: 0.58
, place
Weight: 0.57
, situation
Weight: 0.57
, officer
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bastille
Weight: 0.40
, jail
Weight: 0.37
, workhouse
Weight: 0.35
, courthouse
Weight: 0.33
, capital punishment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tv 1.00
have cable tv 0.90
have tv in cell 0.87
have monocles on tv 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(officer, have monocles on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(prison, have tv)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(officer, have monocles on tv)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(officer, have monocles on tv)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(officer, have monocles on tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(prison, have tv)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(prison, have tv)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(prison, have cable tv)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(prison, have cable tv)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(prison, have cable tv)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(prison, have cable tv)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(prison, have tv in cell)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(prison, have tv)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(prison, have tv)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(officer, have monocles on tv)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(prison, have tv) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(officer, have monocles on tv)