privilege: be seen as kind of crime

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.61
, freedom
Weight: 0.60
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, provision
Weight: 0.57
Siblings license
Weight: 0.67
, opportunity
Weight: 0.65
, liberty
Weight: 0.60
, status
Weight: 0.60
, recess
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be seen as kind of crime 1.00
be seen as kind 0.91
be important in criminal cases 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(concept, be important in criminal cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(privilege, be seen as kind of crime)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(concept, be important in criminal cases)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(concept, be important in criminal cases)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(concept, be important in criminal cases) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(privilege, be seen as kind of crime)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(privilege, be seen as kind of crime)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(privilege, be seen as kind)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(privilege, be seen as kind)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(privilege, be seen as kind)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(privilege, be seen as kind)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(privilege, be seen as kind of crime)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(privilege, be seen as kind of crime)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(concept, be important in criminal cases)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(privilege, be seen as kind of crime) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(concept, be important in criminal cases)