problem: were solved back then

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.77
, issue
Weight: 0.65
, puzzle
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.63
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.80
, toothache
Weight: 0.68
, inequality
Weight: 0.68
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.68
, limitation
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
were solved back then 1.00
were solved back 0.98
were solved then 0.98
were solved 0.94
were solved with constitution 0.86
be resolved 0.83
solve related 0.81
be how resolved 0.81
solve important in school 0.81
be solve in science 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(issue, be how resolved)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(problem, were solved back then)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(issue, be resolved)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(problem, were solved back then)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(issue, be resolved)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(issue, be how resolved)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(issue, be resolved)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(issue, be how resolved)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(issue, be resolved)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(problem, were solved back then)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(issue, be how resolved)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(problem, were solved back then)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(problem, were solved back then)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(problem, were solved with constitution)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(problem, were solved with constitution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(problem, solve important in school)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(problem, be solve in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(problem, be solve in science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(problem, solve important in school)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(problem, were solved with constitution)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(problem, be solve in science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(problem, were solved with constitution)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(problem, solve important in school)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(problem, be solve in science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(problem, solve important in school)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(problem, were solved back then)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(problem, were solved back then)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(issue, be resolved)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(issue, be how resolved)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(issue, be resolved)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(problem, were solved back then)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(issue, be how resolved)