process: be considered anaerobic

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mechanism
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, step
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.68
, digestion
Weight: 0.67
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.66
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered anaerobic 1.00
is endothermic 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fermentation, be considered anaerobic)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, is endothermic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(fermentation, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fermentation, be considered anaerobic)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(photosynthesis, is endothermic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, is endothermic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(process, be considered anaerobic)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(process, is endothermic)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(process, is endothermic)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(process, is endothermic)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(process, is endothermic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(process, be considered anaerobic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(process, be considered anaerobic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fermentation, be considered anaerobic)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(process, be considered anaerobic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(photosynthesis, is endothermic)