produce: be in refrigerator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.60
, department
Weight: 0.54
, cause
Weight: 0.54
, ingredient
Weight: 0.52
Siblings raw material
Weight: 0.66
, berry
Weight: 0.60
, paddy
Weight: 0.41
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.33
, fruit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in refrigerator 1.00
stay in refrigerator 0.96
is fridge 0.92
ripen more slowly in refrigerator 0.84
ripen more quickly than than refrigerator 0.84
taste refrigerated cold 0.80
taste better refrigerated cold 0.79
taste refrigerated 0.79
taste better refrigerated 0.78
cook quickly in microwave 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, stay in refrigerator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(berry, is fridge)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, ripen more slowly in refrigerator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, stay in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fruit, stay in refrigerator)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(berry, is fridge)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(berry, is fridge)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(fruit, ripen more slowly in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fruit, ripen more slowly in refrigerator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(produce, be in refrigerator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(produce, be in refrigerator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(produce, be in refrigerator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, stay in refrigerator)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(berry, is fridge)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(produce, be in refrigerator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(fruit, ripen more slowly in refrigerator)