producer: be important in ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.62
, farmer
Weight: 0.61
, seller
Weight: 0.60
Siblings creator
Weight: 0.63
, babyface
Weight: 0.53
, cool
Weight: 0.50
, brewer
Weight: 0.50
, film maker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in ecosystem 1.00
be in ecosystem important 1.00
be important to ecosystem 1.00
be essential to ecosystem 0.96
be essential component of ecosystem 0.91
interact in ecosystem 0.91
be essential to ecosystems 0.89
be important for transfer of energy within ecosystem 0.87
be related to primary consumers in ecosystem 0.85
be important in coral reef ecosystem 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(producer, be in ecosystem important)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important to ecosystem)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(producer, be in ecosystem important)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(producer, be essential to ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(producer, interact in ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(producer, be essential to ecosystem)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(producer, be essential component of ecosystem)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(producer, be essential component of ecosystem)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(producer, interact in ecosystem)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(producer, be essential to ecosystems)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(producer, be essential to ecosystems)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(producer, be important for transfer of energy within ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(producer, be in ecosystem important)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(producer, be in ecosystem important)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important for transfer of energy within ecosystem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(producer, interact in ecosystem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important in coral reef ecosystem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(producer, be important to ecosystem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(producer, be related to primary consumers in ecosystem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(producer, be important to ecosystem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(producer, be essential to ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(producer, be essential to ecosystem)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(producer, interact in ecosystem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(producer, be essential component of ecosystem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(producer, be essential component of ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(producer, be essential to ecosystems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(producer, be essential to ecosystems)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(producer, be important to ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(producer, be important for transfer of energy within ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(producer, be important for transfer of energy within ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(producer, be important in coral reef ecosystem)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(producer, be related to primary consumers in ecosystem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(producer, be important in coral reef ecosystem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(producer, be related to primary consumers in ecosystem)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(producer, be related to primary consumers in ecosystem)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(producer, be important in coral reef ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important in ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)