producer: be important to food chain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.62
, farmer
Weight: 0.61
, seller
Weight: 0.60
Siblings creator
Weight: 0.63
, babyface
Weight: 0.53
, cool
Weight: 0.50
, brewer
Weight: 0.50
, film maker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important food chain 1.00
be important to food chain 1.00
be important in food chain 1.00
be in food chain 0.98
be first in food chain 0.96
start food chain 0.95
be at beginning of food chain 0.94
be at bottom of food chain 0.92
be at base of food chain 0.92
be necessary in food chains 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(producer, be important to food chain)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(producer, be in food chain)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(producer, be important in food chain)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(producer, be in food chain)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(producer, be in food chain)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(producer, start food chain)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(producer, be first in food chain)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(producer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(producer, be at beginning of food chain)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important in food chain)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(producer, be first in food chain)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(producer, be necessary in food chains)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(producer, be at base of food chain)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(producer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(producer, be in food chain)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(producer, be at beginning of food chain)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(producer, start food chain)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(producer, be necessary in food chains)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(producer, start food chain)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(producer, be important in food chain)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(producer, start food chain)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(producer, be necessary in food chains)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(producer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(producer, be at base of food chain)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(producer, be important in food chain)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(producer, be necessary in food chains)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(producer, be at base of food chain)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(producer, be at beginning of food chain)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(producer, be first in food chain)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(producer, be at bottom of food chain)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(producer, be at base of food chain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(producer, be at beginning of food chain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(producer, be first in food chain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important to food chain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(producer, be important to food chain)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(producer, be important to food chain)