production: be important in provision of goods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings consumption
Weight: 0.58
, manufacturing
Weight: 0.34
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, film
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in provision of goods 1.00
be important in provision of goods to consumers 0.95
be important in provision 0.91
be important in provision to consumers 0.88
compete for goods 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sector, compete for goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(production, be important in provision of goods)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sector, compete for goods)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(sector, compete for goods)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sector, compete for goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(production, be important in provision of goods)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(production, be important in provision of goods)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in provision of goods to consumers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in provision)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(production, be important in provision of goods to consumers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in provision to consumers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(production, be important in provision)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(production, be important in provision to consumers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(production, be important in provision)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(production, be important in provision of goods to consumers)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(production, be important in provision)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(production, be important in provision to consumers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(production, be important in provision of goods to consumers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(production, be important in provision to consumers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in provision of goods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(production, be important in provision of goods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sector, compete for goods)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(production, be important in provision of goods) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sector, compete for goods)