production: beneficial

Related concepts

Parents	adaptation Weight: 0.62 , business activity Weight: 0.60 , sector Weight: 0.59 , aspect Weight: 0.58 , variable Weight: 0.58
Siblings	consumption Weight: 0.58 , manufacturing Weight: 0.34 , oil company Weight: 0.33 , automobile industry Weight: 0.32 , film Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
beneficial	1.00
is beneficial	0.99
more beneficial	0.96
is advantageous	0.85
be beneficial to organisms	0.84
beneficial for survival	0.84
more beneficial for survival	0.83
is useful	0.79
be important to ecomorphs	0.78
beneficial for survival of future generations	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(production, beneficial)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(variable, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(production, beneficial)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(adaptation, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(production, beneficial)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(adaptation, be beneficial to organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(production, beneficial)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(adaptation, be beneficial to organisms)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(adaptation, is useful)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(variable, is useful)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(variable, is useful)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(adaptation, is useful)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be beneficial to organisms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(production, beneficial)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(variable, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(production, beneficial)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(adaptation, be beneficial to organisms) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(production, beneficial)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(adaptation, is useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(production, beneficial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(production, beneficial)

Similarity expansion

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(production, more beneficial)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(production, more beneficial)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(production, more beneficial)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(production, more beneficial)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(production, beneficial for survival)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(production, more beneficial for survival)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(production, more beneficial for survival)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(production, beneficial for survival)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(production, beneficial for survival of future generations)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(production, beneficial for survival)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(production, more beneficial for survival)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(production, more beneficial for survival)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.82

Salient(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(production, beneficial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(adaptation, be beneficial to organisms)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(adaptation, is useful)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(variable, is useful)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(adaptation, be beneficial to organisms)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(adaptation, is useful)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(variable, is useful)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.64

Typical(production, beneficial) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs)