production: go down in stage

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings consumption
Weight: 0.58
, manufacturing
Weight: 0.34
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, film
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
go down in stage 1.00
go down in third stage 0.95
act different from stage 0.87
act differnet from stage 0.80
act different from stage acting 0.79
act differnet from stage acting 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(film, act differnet from stage acting)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(film, act different from stage acting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(film, act different from stage acting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(film, act different from stage acting)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(film, act differnet from stage acting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(film, act differnet from stage acting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(production, go down in stage)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(production, go down in third stage)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(production, go down in third stage)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(production, go down in third stage)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(production, go down in third stage)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(production, go down in stage)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(production, go down in stage)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(film, act different from stage acting)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(production, go down in stage) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(film, act differnet from stage acting)