profile: have points

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.59
, characteristic
Weight: 0.59
, activity
Weight: 0.55
, configuration
Weight: 0.55
Siblings celebrity
Weight: 0.31
, business activity
Weight: 0.31
, sensitivity
Weight: 0.31
, frequency
Weight: 0.31
, concentration
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have points 1.00
have worthless points 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(profile, have points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(profile, have points)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(profile, have points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(profile, have worthless points)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(profile, have points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(profile, have worthless points)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(profile, have points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(profile, have worthless points)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(profile, have points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(profile, have worthless points)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(profile, have points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(profile, have points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(profile, have points)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(profile, have points) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(profile, have points)