profit: be added back on liability side

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.60
, motive
Weight: 0.60
, report
Weight: 0.59
, statement
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cent
Weight: 0.60
, speculator
Weight: 0.42
, revenue
Weight: 0.35
, equity
Weight: 0.32
, bank statement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be added back on liability side 1.00
is liability 0.89
be treated as liability 0.86
be shown on liabilities side 0.80
be on side 0.78
be on same side 0.78
be added back in capital 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(revenue, is liability)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(revenue, is liability) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(revenue, is liability)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(profit, be added back on liability side)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(profit, be treated as liability)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(profit, be treated as liability)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(profit, be treated as liability)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(profit, be shown on liabilities side)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(profit, be treated as liability)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(profit, be shown on liabilities side)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(profit, be shown on liabilities side)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(profit, be shown on liabilities side)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(profit, be added back on liability side)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(profit, be added back on liability side)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(profit, be added back on liability side) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(revenue, is liability)