profit: be high in monopolistic firm

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.60
, motive
Weight: 0.60
, report
Weight: 0.59
, statement
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cent
Weight: 0.60
, speculator
Weight: 0.42
, revenue
Weight: 0.35
, equity
Weight: 0.32
, bank statement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in monopolistic firm 1.00
be high in firm 0.82
demand in monopoly 0.82
be important to companies 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important to companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(profit, be high in monopolistic firm)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(value, be important to companies)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(value, be important to companies)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(revenue, demand in monopoly)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(value, be important to companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(profit, be high in monopolistic firm)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(revenue, demand in monopoly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(revenue, demand in monopoly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(profit, be high in monopolistic firm)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(profit, be high in monopolistic firm)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(profit, be high in monopolistic firm)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important to companies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(revenue, demand in monopoly)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(profit, be high in monopolistic firm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(value, be important to companies)