profit: include fixed costs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.60
, motive
Weight: 0.60
, report
Weight: 0.59
, statement
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cent
Weight: 0.60
, speculator
Weight: 0.42
, revenue
Weight: 0.35
, equity
Weight: 0.32
, bank statement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
include fixed costs 1.00
include costs 0.94
be included in costs 0.91
cost of is cost 0.82
cost of things 0.78
is expenses 0.77
be equal to cost 0.76
equal cost 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be equal to cost)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(revenue, equal cost)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(revenue, is expenses)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(equity, cost of is cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(equity, cost of is cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(equity, cost of is cost)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(revenue, is expenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(revenue, is expenses)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(revenue, equal cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(revenue, equal cost)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(revenue, be equal to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(revenue, be equal to cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(profit, include fixed costs)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(profit, be included in costs)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(profit, be included in costs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(profit, cost of things)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(profit, be included in costs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(profit, cost of things)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(profit, cost of things)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(profit, be included in costs)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(profit, cost of things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(profit, include fixed costs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(profit, include fixed costs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(equity, cost of is cost)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(revenue, is expenses)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(revenue, equal cost)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(profit, include fixed costs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(revenue, be equal to cost)