program: be called apps now

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer program
Weight: 0.67
, package
Weight: 0.64
, nation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings camp
Weight: 0.66
, peace corps
Weight: 0.65
, campaign
Weight: 0.65
, kindergarten
Weight: 0.65
, philosophy
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called apps now 1.00
be called apps 0.98
get on osx app store 0.85
be called applications 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer program, be called apps)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, be called apps now)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(computer program, be called apps)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(computer program, be called apps)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(computer program, be called apps)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(program, be called apps now)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(program, be called apps now)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(program, be called apps)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(program, be called apps)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(program, get on osx app store)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(program, be called apps)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(program, get on osx app store)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, be called apps now)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, be called apps now)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(computer program, be called apps)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(program, be called apps now)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(computer program, be called apps)