program: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer program
Weight: 0.67
, package
Weight: 0.64
, nation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings camp
Weight: 0.66
, peace corps
Weight: 0.65
, campaign
Weight: 0.65
, kindergarten
Weight: 0.65
, philosophy
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality bad 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(computer program, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(peace corps, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(computer program, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(program, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(peace corps, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(peace corps, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(program, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(program, has quality bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(program, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(program, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(program, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(program, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(peace corps, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(program, is quality)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(computer program, has quality bad)