programmer: use old laptops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musician
Weight: 0.62
, talent
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.57
Siblings developer
Weight: 0.57
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.34
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, scientist
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use old laptops 1.00
use computers 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use old laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use computers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(programmer, use old laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scientist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(scientist, use computers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(programmer, use old laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(programmer, use old laptops)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(programmer, use old laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(programmer, use computers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(programmer, use old laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(programmer, use computers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(programmer, use old laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(programmer, use computers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(programmer, use old laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(programmer, use old laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(programmer, use old laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use old laptops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(programmer, use old laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(programmer, use old laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use old laptops) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scientist, use computers)