programmer: use virtual machines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musician
Weight: 0.62
, talent
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.57
Siblings developer
Weight: 0.57
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.34
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, scientist
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
use virtual machines 1.00
use computers 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(developer, use virtual machines)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scientist, use computers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(developer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(developer, use virtual machines)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scientist, use computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(scientist, use computers)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(programmer, use virtual machines)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use computers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(programmer, use computers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(programmer, use computers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(programmer, use computers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use virtual machines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(programmer, use virtual machines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(developer, use virtual machines)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use virtual machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(scientist, use computers)