programming language: have case

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.81
, syntax
Weight: 0.67
, computer science
Weight: 0.67
, topic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings source code
Weight: 0.69
, smalltalk
Weight: 0.68
, perl
Weight: 0.68
, lisp
Weight: 0.67
, basic
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
have case 1.00
have sensitive case 0.87
have cases 0.86
have case letters 0.83
have upper case letters 0.77
be involved in criminal investigations 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(computer science, be involved in criminal investigations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(programming language, have case)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(computer science, be involved in criminal investigations)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(computer science, be involved in criminal investigations)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(computer science, be involved in criminal investigations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(programming language, have case)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(programming language, have case)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(programming language, have sensitive case)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(programming language, have sensitive case)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(programming language, have sensitive case)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(programming language, have sensitive case)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(programming language, have case)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(programming language, have case)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(computer science, be involved in criminal investigations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(programming language, have case) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(computer science, be involved in criminal investigations)