programming: has trait fun

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer science
Weight: 0.61
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
Siblings computer programming
Weight: 0.71
, tv show
Weight: 0.64
, comedy
Weight: 0.62
, broadcast
Weight: 0.55
, programming language
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has trait fun 1.00
making fun of men 0.78
is thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(computer science, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(programming, has trait fun)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(computer science, has trait fun)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(computer science, has trait fun)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(comedy, is thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(computer science, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(programming, has trait fun)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(comedy, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(comedy, is thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(programming, has trait fun)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(programming, has trait fun)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(programming, has trait fun)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(computer science, has trait fun)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(comedy, is thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(programming, has trait fun) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(computer science, has trait fun)