progressive: hate global poor

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents label
Weight: 0.59
, publication
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.56
Siblings liberal
Weight: 0.34
, vanguard
Weight: 0.32
, socialist
Weight: 0.32
, address label
Weight: 0.32
, radical
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hate global poor 1.00
hate poor 0.90
hate 0.76
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(liberal, hate)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(radical, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(vanguard, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(liberal, hate) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(liberal, hate)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(radical, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(radical, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(vanguard, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(vanguard, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(progressive, hate global poor)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(progressive, hate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(progressive, hate)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(progressive, hate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(progressive, hate)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(progressive, hate global poor)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(progressive, hate global poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(liberal, hate)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(radical, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(progressive, hate global poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(vanguard, has quality bad)