prohibition: was failure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.65
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.36
, ordinance
Weight: 0.36
, amendment
Weight: 0.35
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, mandate
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was failure 1.00
fail 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(policy, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(prohibition, was failure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(policy, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(policy, fail)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(amendment, fail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(policy, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was failure)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(amendment, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(amendment, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(prohibition, was failure)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, fail)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(prohibition, fail)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(prohibition, fail)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(prohibition, fail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was failure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(prohibition, was failure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(policy, fail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(amendment, fail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(prohibition, was failure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(policy, fail)