prohibition: was successful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.65
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.36
, ordinance
Weight: 0.36
, amendment
Weight: 0.35
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, mandate
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was successful 1.00
was unsuccessful 0.79
was important to 1920s 0.78
was good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(prohibition, was successful)

Similarity expansion

0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(prohibition, was important to 1920s)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(prohibition, was unsuccessful)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was unsuccessful)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was unsuccessful)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was important to 1920s)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(prohibition, was unsuccessful)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was important to 1920s)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(prohibition, was good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(prohibition, was important to 1920s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was successful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(prohibition, was successful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(prohibition, was successful)