project: bring national development

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
bring national development 1.00
bring about national development 0.98
bring development 0.93
bring about development 0.92
be needed for development of country 0.85
be important in development 0.84
be needed for development 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(facility, be needed for development of country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(project, bring national development)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(facility, be needed for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(project, bring national development)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(facility, be needed for development of country)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(facility, be needed for development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(facility, be needed for development of country)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(facility, be needed for development)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(facility, be needed for development of country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(project, bring national development)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(facility, be needed for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(project, bring national development)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(project, bring national development)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(project, bring development)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(project, bring about development)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(project, bring development)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(project, bring development)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(project, bring about development)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(project, bring about national development)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(project, bring about national development)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(project, bring about development)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, bring about national development)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, bring about national development)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(project, be important in development)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(project, bring development)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(project, be important in development)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(project, bring about development)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(project, be important in development)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(project, bring national development)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(project, bring national development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development of country)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development of country)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(project, bring national development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development)