project: fail pmi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail pmi 1.00
fail in nigeria 0.76
be juan bautista used 0.75
work at mk xiv ur 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(upgrade, work at mk xiv ur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(project, fail pmi)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(upgrade, work at mk xiv ur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(upgrade, work at mk xiv ur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(upgrade, work at mk xiv ur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(project, fail pmi)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(project, fail pmi)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(project, fail in nigeria)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(project, fail in nigeria)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(project, fail in nigeria)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(project, fail in nigeria)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(project, fail pmi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(project, fail pmi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(upgrade, work at mk xiv ur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(project, fail pmi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(upgrade, work at mk xiv ur)