project: has physical part structure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part structure 1.00
has physical part hands 0.78
has physical part zones 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(project, has physical part structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(landscaping, has physical part zones)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(project, has physical part structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has physical part hands)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(project, has physical part structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(construction worker, has physical part hands) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(construction worker, has physical part hands)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(project, has physical part structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(landscaping, has physical part zones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(landscaping, has physical part zones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(project, has physical part structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(project, has physical part structure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(project, has physical part structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(project, has physical part structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(project, has physical part structure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(project, has physical part structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(project, has physical part structure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(project, has physical part structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(construction worker, has physical part hands)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(project, has physical part structure) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(landscaping, has physical part zones)