project: screen necessary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
screen necessary 1.00
is necessary 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mission, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(project, screen necessary)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mission, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(mission, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(restoration, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mission, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(project, screen necessary)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(restoration, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(restoration, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(project, screen necessary)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(project, screen necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(project, screen necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mission, is necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(restoration, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(project, screen necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mission, is necessary)