projection: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	estimate Weight: 0.72 , factor Weight: 0.60 , thing Weight: 0.57 , issue Weight: 0.55
Siblings	bay window Weight: 0.60 , analysis Weight: 0.57 , mercator Weight: 0.43 , stopper Weight: 0.43 , dormer Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(projection, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(analysis, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(projection, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(analysis, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(analysis, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(projection, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(projection, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(projection, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(projection, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(projection, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.85

Plausible(projection, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(projection, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(projection, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(analysis, has quality good)