projector: have ethernet ports

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have ethernet ports 1.00
have ports 0.89
have usb ports 0.86
use types of ports 0.85
use same types of ports 0.84
appear as one on router 0.78
have wifi 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(device, appear as one on router)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(projector, have ethernet ports)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(device, appear as one on router)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(device, appear as one on router)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, use types of ports)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, use same types of ports)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, have wifi)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(device, appear as one on router)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(projector, have ethernet ports)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(digital camera, have wifi)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(digital camera, have wifi)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(laptop computer, use types of ports)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, use types of ports)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(laptop computer, use same types of ports)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, use same types of ports)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(projector, have ethernet ports)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(projector, have ports)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(projector, have usb ports)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(projector, have usb ports)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(projector, have usb ports)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(projector, have ports)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(projector, have wifi)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(projector, have wifi)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, have wifi)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(projector, have wifi)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(projector, have ports)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(projector, have usb ports)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(projector, have ports)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(projector, have ethernet ports)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(device, appear as one on router)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(laptop computer, use types of ports)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(laptop computer, use same types of ports)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(digital camera, have wifi)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(projector, have ethernet ports)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(device, appear as one on router)