projector: is hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hot 1.00
get hot 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(projector, is hot)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(projector, is hot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(electronic device, get hot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, get hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, get hot)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(device, get hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(projector, is hot)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(electronic device, get hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(projector, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(projector, is hot)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(projector, get hot)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(projector, get hot)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(projector, get hot)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(projector, get hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(projector, is hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(projector, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(electronic device, get hot)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(device, get hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(electronic device, get hot)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(projector, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(device, get hot)