projector: is zoom

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is zoom 1.00
zoom 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(projector, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(digital camera, is zoom)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projector, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(digital camera, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(digital camera, is zoom)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projector, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(projector, is zoom)

Similarity expansion

0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(projector, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(projector, zoom)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projector, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(projector, zoom)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(projector, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(projector, zoom)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(projector, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(projector, zoom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(projector, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(projector, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(projector, is zoom)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(projector, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(projector, is zoom)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(projector, is zoom)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(digital camera, is zoom)