prom: be held in places

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.66
, high school
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, night
Weight: 0.53
, party
Weight: 0.52
Siblings school district
Weight: 0.35
, wedding reception
Weight: 0.35
, reunion
Weight: 0.34
, dinner
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be held in places 1.00
be held in big places 0.96
is held 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(event, is held)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prom, be held in places)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(event, is held)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(event, is held)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(event, is held)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(prom, be held in places)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(prom, be held in places)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(prom, be held in big places)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prom, is held)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(prom, is held)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(prom, be held in big places)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(prom, is held)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(prom, is held)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(prom, be held in big places)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(prom, be held in big places)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(prom, be held in places)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(prom, be held in places)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(event, is held)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(prom, be held in places)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(event, is held)