promotion: actually work in food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.59
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, change
Weight: 0.57
, program
Weight: 0.56
, candidate
Weight: 0.56
Siblings campaign
Weight: 0.32
, attraction
Weight: 0.31
, success
Weight: 0.31
, assignment
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
actually work in food 1.00
actually work in fast food 0.94
work 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(promotion, actually work in food)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(duty, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(promotion, actually work in food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(duty, work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(duty, work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(attraction, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(campaign, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(assignment, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(promotion, actually work in food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(duty, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(promotion, actually work in food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(assignment, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(assignment, work)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(attraction, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(attraction, work)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(campaign, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(campaign, work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(promotion, actually work in food)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in fast food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(promotion, actually work in fast food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(promotion, actually work in fast food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(promotion, work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(promotion, work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(promotion, actually work in fast food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(promotion, work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(promotion, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(promotion, actually work in food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(duty, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(assignment, work)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(attraction, work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(campaign, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(duty, work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(promotion, actually work in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)