promotion: is effective

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.59
, duty
Weight: 0.57
, change
Weight: 0.57
, program
Weight: 0.56
, candidate
Weight: 0.56
Siblings campaign
Weight: 0.32
, attraction
Weight: 0.31
, success
Weight: 0.31
, assignment
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is effective 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(promotion, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(campaign, is effective)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(promotion, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(campaign, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(campaign, is effective)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(promotion, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(promotion, is effective)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(promotion, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(promotion, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(promotion, is effective)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(promotion, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(promotion, is effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(promotion, is effective) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(campaign, is effective)